Our review process
Our methodology explains what we judge a platform on. This page explains the workflow each page goes through before it reaches you — and after.
The process, step by step
Every Quotex page on this site follows the same sequence so our coverage stays consistent and accountable.
We define the user intent behind a page and gather primary sources: the platform's published policies, regulator registers and reliable reporting.
We read the relevant official documents — risk, payment and trading rules — and note what is stated versus what is unclear.
Where possible we observe the platform directly (interface, sign-up, demo) and label it as observation, not a guarantee of every user's experience.
We write the page around the real question, separating verified facts, observations and interpretation, and adding risk and availability caveats.
A compliance editor checks for unsupported claims, missing risk warnings, profit promises or legal/regulatory overstatements.
We publish with a named writer, reviewer and last-updated date, plus the affiliate disclosure.
We revisit pages when policies, availability or user-reported patterns change, and update the date when we make material edits.
What this process cannot do
A transparent process should also admit its limits. We cannot guarantee that your individual experience — for example, a withdrawal time — will match the platform's policies, and we do not invent testing we have not done. Our process reduces error and overstatement; it does not turn a high-risk product into a safe one. The underlying risk of trading fixed-time options remains regardless of how carefully we review.